Videos as records

2 posts / 0 new
Last post
desperately.see...
Videos as records

All

I had a record rejected because the recorder couldn't confirm the ID from the picture. I totally get that. The ID would have been confirmable if I could have posted a video of the record as the way the specific creature moves is pretty much diagnostic for the family (which is what I recorded). My record was of a Whirligig Beetle and I totally understand that a stationery picture of one is not very helpful. IF I could have posted a video it may have made a difference. Is there any chance this may happen/be available in the future? Are space and bandwidth limitations preventing this?

Just enquiring

James Emerson
Looks like the verifier wants species-level only

I can't answer the part about whether videos will be allowed in the future, although I suggest that as you say it's partly a bandwith issue and partly that a video will only occasionally be more useful than a still photo for the verifier. Having had a look at various Whirligig Beetle records it appears that the verifier for this group is only accepting records where a specimen has been identified to species, so whenever someone has recorded a whirligig beetle to family level or genus level he has rejected the record as "rejected as unable to verify". So in other words a video wouldn't help in this scenario. Different schemes and verifiers have individual approaches to accepting records below species level - some welcome them and verify in the same way as species, some mark as plausible so they don't show up on the downloaded dataset and others take this route.

Log in to post comments